Twenty years ago, Luke Cole identified the need for
“environmental poverty law,” which he described as “a model of practice based
on client empowerment, group representation, and a narrow role for legal
tools.” [Luke W. Cole, Empowerment as the Key to Environmental Protection: The
Need for Environmental Poverty Law, 19 ECOLOGY L.Q. 619, 683 (1992). ] In honor of Cole’s life and work, which
were devoted to representing low-income and minority communities exposed to
more than their fair share of environmental harms, the American Bar Association
invites thoughtful essays on the evolution and future of environmental justice
lawyering. Essays may address issues such as standing and the limits of
available causes of action; ethical, organizational, principal-agent, and other
challenges of representing environmental justice communities and community based
organizations; special concerns with good neighbor, community benefits, and
other agreements; the appropriate roles an attorney should play in advancing
client and community interests; implications of recent developments such as
EPA’s Plan EJ 2014 (including “Legal Tools,” a review of available legal
authorities), the preliminary finding of adverse, disparate impact of
agency-funded activities under Title VI and subsequent settlement in Angelita
C, and the rise of “climate justice” as an organizing principle.
PRIZE: The winning essay will receive an offer of
publication from the Brooklyn Law Review and a prize of $1,000, courtesy of the American Bar Association. Submissions are due by Friday, May 3, 2013. Members of ABA’s
Environmental Justice Committee and editors of the Brooklyn Law Review will select
the winner, to be announced on Friday, July 12, 2013. The Committee includes the following
members:
RULES
ELIGIBILITY: The competition is open to currently enrolled
students of ABA-accredited law schools and recent graduates (within one year).
Only original, non-published essays will be considered. Papers submitted for
course requirements are eligible for entry. Each entrant may submit only one
paper.
AUTHORSHIP: Each essay must be authored by only one student.
Jointly written papers will not be accepted.
FORMAT: Essays must be between twenty-five and forty pages
in length, inclusive of footnotes, double-spaced. Essay style must conform to
the current edition of THE BLUEBOOK: A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION.
DEADLINE: Submissions must be postmarked or emailed no later
than Friday, May 3, 2013.
SUBMISSION: Papers must be submitted either online in MS
Word or in hard copy at the appropriate address below. Each submission must
include the following information about the author: (a) name; (b) law school
affiliation; (c) telephone number; (d) mailing address; and (e) email address.
Papers will not be returned to authors.
PUBLICATION: Each submission must be accompanied by a letter
certifying that the essay has not been previously published, that it is the student’s
work only, and that Brooklyn Law School and the American Bar Association have
independent, exclusive rights of publication, should the essay be selected as
the winner of the competition.
JUDGING CRITERIA: Essays will be evaluated on the basis of
four criteria: originality, depth and quality of research and analysis, relevance
(timeliness, contribution to the field), and clarity of expression. Judges’
evaluations will not be made available to entrants or the public.
ADDRESS: Please send all questions and submissions to Gregg
Macey, Chair, Environmental Justice Committee, American Bar Association Section
of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, Brooklyn Law School, 250 Joralemon
Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11201 or via email (preferred) at gregg.macey@brooklaw.edu,
attn: Essay Competition.
FINALITY: Decisions of the judges concerning the competition
are final.
1 comment:
Sometimes businesses with less-than-perfect credit score use money advances to finance their activities. In some instances these advances unit even procured with future credit score cards receipts. the payday loans online chicago amount of the money enhance depends on the money score rating of a business and its credit score cards sales. among the majority cases, money advances got to be compelled to be compelled to be compelled to be viewed as a results of the planning of expedient.
Post a Comment